On 14.05.2010 16:58, Lorenzo De Liso wrote: >> 5. Please list five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs >> should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to >> properly handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not >> have an importance indicate what importance you would give it after >> becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug Control. Please use urls in your list >> of bugs. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvipsk-ja/+bug/570858 (I'd > give the importance "medium" because it has a moderate impact, since it > isn't installable). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/570879 > (I'd give the importance "medium" because the program could not be used > properly). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnumeric/+bug/570836 (I'd give > the importance "low" because it can be easily fixed and is a low-impact > bug). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/571257 (I'd give > the importance "medium" if the reporter will report more information > about the bug - because gedit can't be used for read the created files > and that's a significant impact). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-games/+bug/571300 (I'd > give the importance "low" becuase it has a low-impact and the > application can be used with it).
Lorenzo asked me to follow up on this email. Although I can't comment extensively, I'd like to mention that we recently added him to the ubuntu-reviewers team and although I just reviewed a very few bugs I was quite happy with what he'd done there. Have a great day, Daniel _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
