On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:30 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > • Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to > you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > > I promise. :) > > • Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and > Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation? > > I have. No questions. > > • What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more information. > > CoreDump.gz must always be removed. Stacktrace.txt should be inspected > for sensitive information. > > • Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > interested in helping out with? > > As a member of the Canonical Platform Server Development Team I'm > particularly interested in helping to triage the server-team bugs. > > • Please list five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs > should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to > properly handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not > have an importance indicate what importance (and explain the > reasoning) you would give it after becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug > Control. Please use urls in your list of bugs. > > Here is a list of bugs i've triaged recently: > > Confirmed + forwarded upstream: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdparm/+bug/590129 > Importance should be "Low" - This is just a documentation fix.
Agree, marked the bug Triaged/Low. > Reported upstream + patched (Status=>Confirmed): > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/591475 Importance should be > "Medium" - LVM2 is a core application and users spend an inordinate > amount of time confirming that their disks are not broken. Also agree, and I marked the bug Triaged/Medium. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memcached/+bug/491685 > Importance should be "Low" - This does not affect most servers, and > will only annoy users mildly. Agreed. Mathias had already marked the bug Triaged/Low, anyways. BTW, there is a comment from him for you. > Marked as duplicate: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/590309 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/541077 Correctly so. > Marked as incomplete: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sqlite3/+bug/590399 > Importance should stay at Undecided until bug report is reproducible > as it is not clear what the impact is. For the Server team, we have a policy to assign an Importance as soon as possible. If, later on, progress on the bug suggests an adjustment on Importance, we are free to do so. As such, I am marking it Low -- we do not have data to fully analyse impact. As an aside, this seems to be a FTBFS (on whatever version the error happened). > Confirmed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/592442 > Importance should be "Medium" as there seems to be no work around for > the issue if a server is incompatible. Agreed. > > Fix Released: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/419091 > Importance should be Medium - All couchdb users in Karmic are affected > by this, so it will be nominated for SRU. Agreed. All in all, good work. I specially like the upstreaming, BTW. +1
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
