On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:05:30AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Brian Murray ([email protected]): > > > # Please list five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs should > > > demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to properly > > > handle > > > bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not have an importance > > > indicate > > > what importance (and explain the reasoning) you would give it after > > > becoming a > > > member of Ubuntu Bug Control. Please use urls in your list of bugs. > > > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/597510 > > > I would have placed this one at low priority, as it > > > was not really a bug. > > > > This seems fine and I'd agree with a low priority here. You might also > > look at http://launchpad.net/bugs/581959 as it is an apport-package bug > > report with the same exit status. > > Interesting - and that one itself may be a dupe :) This one now > actually appears to be a dual bug - the original error was in the > environment, while the new one appears to be a configuration error. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/588293 > > > > I'd modify the title of this bug report to be very specific as it is > > likely to draw comments about the same symptom with different root > > causes. Additionally, someone may end up reopening it after it is fixed > > when they see a memory leak in qemu-kvm. I really appreciate the > > verbosity of your comments in this bug report and documenting tests. > > Good idea, hadn't considered that - thanks. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/595427 > > > I'd place this at low priority, because it can be > > > worked around (by installing the distro). > > > > I'd disagree with the priority for this particular bug as getting people > > to test Ubuntu, which testdrive is one way to do, is very important > > That makes sense. I'd considered thinking along those lines at first, > but decided you needed ubuntu to run testdrive in the first place. But > of course testing iso's is also important. > > > additionally system lock ups like this should be a high priority. I > > wonder if this is a problem on real hardware. > > (I haven't been able to reproduce it on hw.)
That sounds like something worth noting in the bug report so that information is available to everyone. -- Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
