On 04/14/2011 06:13 PM, RedSingularity wrote: > RedSingularity (Tim) Application, > > 1) Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are > rude to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > > -YES / YES > > 2) Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage>, Bugs/Assignment > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Assignment>, Bugs/Status > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status> and Bugs/Importance > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance>? Do you have any > questions about that documentation? > > -YES / NO > > 3) What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport > crash report bug before making it public? > > -Sensitive data to look for in a apport crash would be found in > stacktrace.txt files. Things such as passwords, bank account > numbers, CSS keys, user names, server names, etc may be located in > there. Other items to watch for may be in coredumps/config.files
Thank you! You one of the few that remembered about coredumps ;-) > > 4) Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > interested in helping out with? > > -I work on any package I feel comfortable with. Most of my time > goes to the update-manager package though. I have been working with > that for many months. > > 5) Please list five or more bugs which you have triaged and include > an explanation of your Triage. Please note that these bugs should be > representative of your very best work and they should demonstrate > your understanding of the triage process and how to properly handle > bugs. Importance for each one has been discussed with -control > members before being assigned. > > Bug 734026 > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/734026> > Marked as "Low" because it can be considered a usability issue since > it makes the application more confusing and thus more difficult to > use. It was close between "Low" and "Wishlist". Due to the > usability issue, I gave it Low instead. Thank you. Good work, and -- BTW -- I agree it is potentially confusing. > > Bug 738330 > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ose/+bug/738330> > Marked as "High" because this issue effected ALL users with a Natty > guest at the time. This also meant Unity desktop was not working in > the guest install thus users could not run tests with unity in natty > without having a dedicated system. This was especially bad at the > time due to the high amounts of triage going on for the stable > natty release. Is this still a problem? Just curious, though. Also the issue is getting confused and confusing... But good work. > > Bug 699922 > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/699922> > Marked as "Low", It only effected the group of people using a dual > monitor set up. The issue did not effect the usage of thunderbird > in any way. It was more of a "cosmetic" issue. Extra points for upstreaming it :-) > > Bug 715517 > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/715517> > Marked as "Low", The problem with the restart button was a nuisance > but nothing more. Did not effect the proper working of the > update-manager. And in order to reproduce you need to start > update-manager as root which is not done normally anyway. good work. > > Bug 727069 > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/727069> > Marked "Low", It can effect a persons usability experience since > there is no "Admin" menu in unity and unity will be the default > desktop from now on. Also, this bug is not a feature request, but > rather incorrect wording in an application that needs to be corrected. Good work. > Bug 742101 > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/742101> > Marked "Medium", Didn't want to give it a "High" because that would > really 'flag' it this close to the natty release. It is not enough > to crash the system and the workaround is simple enough. It only > effects those using multiarch repos as well. However it does effect > all releases of ubuntu as of now. Good work, and medium is indeed correct: right now pretty much only developers are using multiarch support. Also *very* good that you maintained your cool even after a somewhat harsh rebuttal from vorlon. Extra points for that: maintaining etiquette is a critical part of our work. So, +1. Given that you already have another +1 from Philip, I am going ahead and accepting your application. Thank you for helping on triage, and Welcome To The Team! Cheers, ..C..
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
