(forwarding to Brandon, given that he is not subscribed to the ML.) On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:29:28 -0700 Matt Fischer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/27/2013 04:00 PM, Brandon Schaefer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > My name is Brandon Schaefer, and Im applying for membership into > > the ~ubuntu-bugcontrol team. > > > > https://launchpad.net/~brandontschaefer > > > > - Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are > > rude to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > > > > Yes, and I have signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct. > > > > - Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and > > Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation? > > > > Yes I have read through them, and most questions have been > > answered :). > > > > - What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash > > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more > > information. > > > > Make sure the CoreDump.gz is removed before making it public. > > > > Checking any of the Stacktraces.txt/ThreadStacktraces.txt for any > > strings containing private information (passwords, user names, etc.) > > > > - Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > > interested in helping out with? > > > > lp:unity > > lp:compiz > > lp:nux > > > > Lots of bugs in those packages :). > > > > - Please list five or more bug reports which you have triaged and > > include an explanation of your decisions. Please note that these > > bugs should be representative of your very best work and they > > should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how > > to properly handle bugs. For all the bugs in the list, please > > indicate what importance you would give it and explain the > > reasoning. Please use urls in your list of bugs. > > Some of these bugs lack enough detail I think to be considered > triaged. Specifically, 961783, 1061939 don't list Ubuntu version or > software version which would make it hard for someone to start on, in > my opinion. Was there any reason for leaving that off? Same question as Matt. Additionally, bugs opened by you are not good examples of *triaging* work. > > > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1086988 > > High, because users were unable to use their application. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/1125351 > > High at first, but moved to a medium because it is a usability > > issue but doesn't cause serious problems with the core of the > > application. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/1112044 > > Medium because it is a usability issue, but wont make the program > > unusable. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1109150 > > Medium because it was a regression of an expected behavior, > > otherwise this would be low importance. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/autopilot/+bug/1061939 > > Medium because the bug causes misleading information, which causes > > impact on the overall application. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/961783 > > Medium because its a big usability problem, but doesn't cause any > > serious problems with the core application. > > Hopefully I haven't missed anything! If not let me know. > >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
