On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:52:27 +0100 Vej <ubu...@jonasdiekmann.de> wrote:
<snip/> > Maybe you want to remove the following sentences from the box in the > documentation under https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20statuses. > Thats were I got this idea from. > > "Paste the report number in #ubuntu-bugs channel at FreeNode and say > you think the report should be set to 'Triaged' with importance > 'Wishlist / Low / Medium / High / Critical' according tW > Bugs/Importance. Someone will notice your comment and set it for you, > although not necessarily immediately." As commented on my previous response, the #ubuntu-bugs channel is there. Use it. The text above should stay as is. > > ------------- > > 💟 PAPERCUT > > ------------- > > > > Jonas Diekmann: > > > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1657092) > > > > (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Triage): > > > If the bug is trivial to fix, is it marked as affecting the > > > "hundredpapercuts" project? > Does this even apply if the bug has a patch attached to it (as was > the case here)? It would probably apply. A papercut bug is generically defined as one easy to fix, but painful to experience. If you think a bug is can be classified as a papercut, add a task to it. Even if a patch is present. It should be pointed out that patches, OTOH, may require a bit more work. We usually prefer patches that have been accepted upstream, so verification will have to be performed. Cheers, ..C..
pgpGTPk_kZts_.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : ubuntu-bugcontrol@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
