On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 22:21 +0000, alrac wrote:
> FAQ.gz
>
Only appropriate for people installing udev -- not useful for an already
installed system.
> NEWS.Debian.gz
>
No such file in the Ubuntu distribution.
> README
>
Shipped (as README.gz)
> README.Debian.gz
>
No such file in the upstream tarball.
> README.chassis_id
>
No such file in the upstream tarball.
> README.vol_id
>
All relevant information available from "man vol_id"
> RELEASE-NOTES.gz
>
Shipped.
> TODO
>
Irrelevant; sysadmins don't care what's on the developer's TODO list --
they can get the source if they want to hack on it.
> changelog.Debian.gz
> changelog.gz
> copyright
>
Shipped.
> name_cdrom.pl
>
No such file in the upstream tarball.
> scsi_id.config
>
Shipped in examples.
> start_udev
>
No such file in the upstream tarball.
> udev.rules.examples
>
No such file in the upstream tarball.
> udevtest-all
>
No such file in the upstream tarball.
> overview
>
Extraordinarily out of date. Wrong documentation is worse than no
documentation.
> persistent_naming/testing_scsi_notes.txt.gz
> persistent_naming/udev.rules_1000_scsi_debug.gz
>
No such file in the upstream tarball.
> udev_vs_devfs.gz
>
Pointless. We don't ship devfs in Ubuntu, so there's no point comparing
them.
> writing_udev_rules/index.html
> writing_udev_rules/index.jp.html
>
Extraordinarily out of date. There is a new version of this being added
in a future udev release upstream, then it will appear in Ubuntu.
> The man pages are not good enough- it sure would be nice to have all the
> udev documention put back.
>
All but one of the above documents are not useful, the only one that it
would be nice to put back is the writing_udev_rules documentation -- but
as noted, that is incorrect at the moment. That will be restored once
upstream issue a new version.
status rejected
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
udev package is missing many documents
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49411
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
