Please, leave aside the inconsistency in the documentation, and just
tell me why the current behaviour of -G is useful.  Why shouldn't it
imply -l?

-- 
Martin

-- 
ls -G is not "just like -l"
https://launchpad.net/bugs/51653

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to