Okay, I can confirm that simple-ubuntu.png is the elephant wallpaper and
that it is 2.6MB while the two others are around 350-500KB. It doesn't
seem to compress so I assume this could save 2MB on the livecd as well,
though I may be wrong.
Is there any reason the original JPG can't be used? Or could the
original author export directly to PNG to prevent this lossless encoding
of a lossy format?
** Changed in: ubuntu-wallpapers (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Status: New => Confirmed
--
simple-ubuntu.png is really elephant-skin.jpg and is toooo big (was converted
from jpg to png)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231130
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
![[Bug 231130] Re: simple-ubuntu.png is really elephant-skin.jpg and is toooo big (was converted from jpg to png)](/search?l=ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com&q=subject:%22%5C%5BBug+231130%5C%5D+Re%5C%3A+simple%5C-ubuntu.png+is+really+elephant%5C-skin.jpg+and+is%09toooo+big+%5C%28was+converted+from+jpg+to+png%5C%29%22&o=newest){kind=link}
