> In summary: I'd hate to see firefox not be the default, but an EULA > is unacceptable. > Could I just remind people that there is no practical difference between a branded and unbranded "firefox". All that happens is that it has different icons and a different name.
If you went through all the code in <insert program here> and changed it's name it would still work the same and look almost the same. solar.george -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
