If it was my decision, the answer would be clear: Rename firefox to iceweasel and be done with it. Now.
Otherwise, this stupidity will just continue. What if Firefox demands that installation should be prohibited on slow machines so that users don't get a wrong impression about performance? Abort Ubuntu installation automatically? Or change the installation system so that the browser is selected based on CPU and memory? I hope, Ubuntu reconsiders this decision and stays independent of the legal games of Mozillla corporation. While we are at it, we should make the google money for the startup page for iceweasel go to Debian/Ubuntu respectively ;-) -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
