There are some good comments in here.  Some comments:

> [...] system could display own license dialog for example during
install instead [ ... ]

This is what just about every other Linux distribution does.  Ubuntu
does not, instead relying on text buried on their web site that serves
the same purpose.  The use of Ubuntu is also defined by a license
agreement, it's just harder to find.  (Which also makes it harder to
enforce down the road, but that's a whole separate issue.)

> If Mozilla's team doesn't want to be reasonable and discuss this with
the ubuntu community [... ]

Actually, we've been talking with people like Red Hat and Canonical for
months and months.  This is not a surprise to them and it was solved
with Red Hat in an amicable way.  I'm not entirely sure why Canonical
had as much of a problem as they do.

> As you probably know Moz Corp make bucket loads of $$ from the google
search bar (literally many millions each year), and it is in their
interest to have firefox used far and wide. [...]

This is technically true, but I think that it it leaves people with the
wrong impression.  Mozilla is a non-profit entity and an open source
project.  We have contributions from thousands of people from all over
the world.  Our operations are funded by search revenue, largely from
Google (but also from others.)  But our motivations having nothing to do
with those revenue numbers.  Our primary motivation is to make sure that
the web is accessible from everywhere and continues to grow.

Sustainability is a huge part of that, and that's why we have business +
revenue relationships with various companies that drive revenue from the
browser.  This is why we've been able to invest + compete vs. other much
larger vendors like Apple and Microsoft.

So while revenue is nice, it's not our main motive.  We don't have
shareholders and no one over here is getting super-rich as a result of
the revenue.

> That is a very black & white view, which skips over the fact that
canonical -is- a mostly FOSS company making a -stack- of new useful
software. [...]

Well, kind of.  Canonical doesn't invest very much.  They largely do
integration and very little upstream heavy lifting.  Mark and Matt and
others say this in public very often so it's not much of a secret.

I point this out because it's a very different model than what Mozilla
does.  We do invest - heavily.  Those revenue numbers which are pointed
to as a bad thing are one of main reasons why there's a top-tier browser
available for Linux.  No one else in Linux has the capacity to make that
investment.  (Mozilla and Canonical have about the same number of full
time employees just to put things in perspective.)

So while Linux maintains a very small market share and doesn't
contribute very much to Mozilla's overall market share or revenue
numbers, we continue to maintain it on behalf of Linux users because we
would love to see Linux be successful and find a path to a larger number
of users.

-- 
AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to