As pointed out earlier in this thread, I found
http://spot.livejournal.com/299409.html to be very informative.

It indicates the static html 'eula' that Fedora 9 uses is only
temporary, and Mozilla is insisting on a complete EULA for Fedora 10.

If that article clearly and accurately represents the interaction
between Mozilla and the Fedora board, then *I* think the only solution
here to either start using Iceweasel or convince Mozilla to reverse
their position (which doesn't sound very hopeful).

I hope everyone who is sincere about resolving this issue (and not just
MAKING NOISE) reviews that article.

-- 
AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to