On 23/09/08 at 05:02 -0000, Joseph Method wrote: > I'd like to file a bug against the communication in this report. Also, > there is a caesura at the end leading to a breakup that is hard to > follow. > > Actually, here's an explanation to save others time: > 1. Neil Wilson uploads a package > 2. Lucas Nussbaum and Scott Kitterman and others disagree with details about > the packaging
No, I also disagree with the solution that was chosen to fix the bug (the use of alternatives). > 0. Clarify that "don't use gems" isn't a solution. Gems are used for different reasons than Deb packages. No, what should be clarified is how much support we want to provide to users of rubygems on Ubuntu. > 3. Commit that *if* Debian rejects movement toward a solution, Ubuntu _can_ maintain its own solution. AFAIK, the Debian rubygems maintainers has never been consulted on this topic. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
