While I appreciate transmission (simple, works) I shouldn't have to point out that "bittorrent" is the reference client for the bittorrent protocol/system/networks, not transmission. In theory, it should work no differently - which is why it's nice to have around to compare to.
Nothing is stopping me from installing bittorrent manually (and I have done so previously) but I would prefer to have the latest in the repository. Is there any reason the official client shouldn't be in the repo? I agree it doesn't need to be on the CD. On 9/27/08, Pablo Castellano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > @drink: you have 'transmission' as default bittorrent client (and also > updated). > > -- > Too many files opened at once > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13371 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in "bittorrent" source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete > > Bug description: > The bittorrent client opens all the file at the beginning > of the transfer, and thus can reach the configured max > open file descriptor by process when trying to download > large torrents. > > It is then completely frozen since a second IOError is > raised and uncaught when the error dialog glade XML > file is opened. > > The following patch fixes the problem by preventing > bittorrent from opening too many file at once (but it > is a bit more cpu / disk hungry since the files are > opened and closed more often) ... > -- Too many files opened at once https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
