On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:52 +0000, Jason Woofenden wrote: > I'm pretty sure the additional functionality provided by ffcall in > gforth is only activated when specifically requested by the programmer > (as it is in some example scripts that come with gforth). So I don't > think inclusion of ffcall could possibly break any existing code written > for gforth.
Ok, I think I'm at a point where I would be willing to upload this after testing. Could you point out a couple of examples from the gforth source package that would be good tests and how to run them once I have the package installed? I'd like a couple that use ffcall and a couple that don't. I'll give it a day or so for motu-release to give any other opinions. One member stated on IRC that they considered this to be a change that didn't need an FFe, so it would just be if they had any concerns over the change. Thanks, James -- gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
