On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 16:20 +0000, Paul Gevers wrote: > > You said you were working on getting a package in to your PPA and then > > you would test it. I just wanted to make sure you had done that, and > > hadn't found any problems. > > > > Should this package still be synced, or do you have patch that needs > > to be applied? > > I am not sure. The package did not build straight in my PPA, but > reversing the dependencies of the binary target in debian/rules worked. > However, as I understand it there is no guarantee on the order that > dependencies are invoked. And I don't know if the build environment in > the real Ubuntu works the same as in the PPA, so it *might* be > considered a patch... > > What would be the best is if the binary-indep target would be build > independent of the binary-arch target. For instance, in my PPA the amd64 > build did not build the binary-indep target, so it did not have any > problems, but building i386 the indep target was build at the same time > as the arch target and that is where things went wrong. (Basically the > debian/files get removed when the binary-indep target is build so if the > arch target is build first, that information is lost).
Yeah, this might just be a bug in the package, as Ubuntu does things slightly differently to Debian here. Thanks, James -- Please sync lazarus 0.9.24-0-12 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
