(to ubuntu-devel)

I discovered on one of my systems (upgraded since forever) that
/etc/rc2.d/S20powernowd was missing, resulting in the cpufreq scaling
governor failing to be set to ondemand by default:

https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/powernowd/+bug/262567

I don't remember doing this manually, and at least one other person has
reported this symlink missing.

I would appreciate if folks could check their systems to see if this symlink
is missing, to see whether there is a larger problem here.

-- 
 - mdz

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: powernowd
  
  On current Intrepid, the 'performance' scaling governor is now being
  used by default on my system, whereas 'ondemand' was previously (Hardy).
  
- Running "/etc/init.d/powernowd start" fixes it, so I assume something
- running later than powernowd.early in the boot sequence is resetting it.
+ It appears that the /etc/rc2.d/S20powernowd symlink is missing, which is
+ where this value is set by default.
  
- Since the kernel handles this itself now, I think we should probably be
- setting this somewhere else and get rid of powernowd entirely in the
- default install.
+ Post-8.10, since the kernel handles this itself now, I think we should
+ probably be setting this somewhere else and get rid of powernowd
+ entirely in the default install.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: i386
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Package: powernowd 1.00-1ubuntu1
  ProcEnviron:
   LC_COLLATE=C
   
PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/lib/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/games
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/zsh
  SourcePackage: powernowd
  Uname: Linux 2.6.26-5-generic i686

-- 
Scaling governor set to 'performance' on boot, rather than 'ondemand'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262567
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to