Having looked at the code, I think the ecryptfs-utils case is an
ecryptfs-utils bug and not a pam bug. The relevant code in pam_ecryptfs
is:
if (!old_passphrase || !new_passphrase) {
syslog(LOG_WARNING, "eCryptfs PAM passphrase change module "
"retrieved at least one NULL passphrase; nothing to "
"do\n");
goto out;
}
but this leaves rc as PAM_SUCCESS - since this module is designed to be
an optional module, this really ought to return PAM_IGNORE instead for
this case.
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: New => Triaged
--
passwd - passwords do not match but updated successfully
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
