Public bug reported:
It is often the case that updates come in without a list of changes.
This is unacceptable for a variety of reasons but primarily prevents a
knowledgeable administrator to predict difficulties a given update might
induce.
I believe it would be appropriate for ubuntu to require a complete list
of changes for all updates in *-updates and *-security. What does
everyone else think?
** Affects: update-manager
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Also affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
updates should always include a list of changes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292170
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
