That sounds preferable to me too. I don't have time to look into it just now, but I can take a look later. I don't think it should be a significant change. I keep wondering if any other packages are dealing with this right now as well?
>From the threads here: http://lists.debian.org/debian- python/2008/03/msg00034.html and here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2008/03/msg00033.html The python defect relating to this is here: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0353/ This may be relevant as well: https://launchpad.net/+search?field.text=Py_InitModule4_64+undefined It seems like it might just be a build thing, with an additional flag being required by bjam. I wonder, does Ubuntu's build call bjam with python 2.5 specified? Googling for this produces quite a few results actually, but unfortunately most of the resolutions I see involve linking against python 2.4 instead of 2.5 :(. So far I'm not sure what the fix is, but I ran out of time for the moment. Will have to come back to this later. Tim. -- gizmod in Ibex fails to run on amd64 systems due to bug in boost-1.34.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
