On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 20:58 +0000, vlowther wrote: > On Nov 11, 2008, at 8:04 AM, hyperair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 13:46 +0000, vlowther wrote: > >> > >> That is what I am saying -- instead of removing the entire hook, just > >> remove the --quirk-vbe-post lines in the smart_kernel_intel function > >> of > >> the 98smart-kernel-video hook. That will cause the hook to not > >> remove > >> the --quirk-vbe-post quirk if it is passed to pm-utils. > > What if HAL wrongly reports that a system requires --quirk-vbe-post, > > when it doesn't? According to vbetool's manpage, it can cause > > "undefined" behaviour, whatever that means. > > We can fix hal easily enough in that case. > > > > > -- > > Chow Loong Jin > > > > -- > > backlight failed after suspend to ram on IBM X40 > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292256 > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > > of the bug. > Alright, here's a debdiff. -- Chow Loong Jin
** Attachment added: "pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu9.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19582479/pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu9.debdiff -- backlight failed after suspend to ram on IBM X40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
