Hi Marcel,

Yes, I am familiar with the purpose of patches.  :)  Believe me, I
completely understand where you are coming from.  I admin plenty of
machines myself and take security seriously.

I have already made my case to them, however it is unlikely they will do
anything about it.  These machines are part of a large, distributed
build server farm at a big company.  The setup is frail and thousands of
engineers around the world depend on its uptime 24/7.  They avoid
touching it at all costs and since the machines are only accessible from
the internal LAN, they don't get too worked up about security issues.  I
am a "rogue" at my job because I am probably one out of a dozen or less
that don't use Windows+Exceed to do the same work.  In other words, they
don't care about me and I am on my own.

I've been digging through the tree of Sun patches and bugs fixed by this
uber-patch and I am not clear what bug I am dealing with here.  All I
was asking is if anyone knew what bug I am fighting so that perhaps I
could dig-in more and find a workaround like I have done the past (the
whole ARGB issue, for example).  If they buy the whole security angle
and patch the servers, then I guess it is moot.  Otherwise I will have
to downgrade to hardy.

Thanks,
Russ

In any case, I

-- 
X apps are receiwing BadAlloc when working over ssh
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to