allee wrote: > Cory, you need to supply more infos. > If dpkg list any pkg (+ version) involved > supply it to.
It doesn't, but I'm game. What should I do to get you the information you need? > > Are you using edgy? Yes. Then libexiv2-10 from my repo > is not needed. You have to remove showfoto pkgs > and install digikam and digikamimageplugins from my > repo. I think we're going in circles. When I tried to install digikam from your repo, it said "Failed to completely install all dependencies (broken cache)" I tried running sudo apt-get install -f but it just removed the half-installed beta and reset me. The error comes back when I try to reinstall. You suggested that I install libexiv2-0.10, but when I tried to do that, it said, "Error: A later version is already installed." > > Works for me an another edgy user on IRC. > But please note it's an unofficial repo . Don't blame > (k)ubuntu about it. Well, yes, but that's the whole point of the bug report in the first place: installing this beta manually is hard. The version in the official Ubuntu repo is out-of-date and contains a critical, show-stopper bug (renaming a photo after importing it makes it vanish) that is fixed in the beta. Which means that potential digiKam users should have the option of installing the fixed (but very hard to manually install) beta, which is why it's a bug in Ubuntu that an official supported repo isn't carrying it. > -- Cory Doctorow [EMAIL PROTECTED] latest novel: craphound.com/someone blog: boingboing.net vanity: craphound.com podcast: feeds.feedburner.com/doctorow_podcast second novel: craphound.com/est collection: craphound.com/place novel: craphound.com/down Join my mailing list and find out about upcoming books, stories, articles and appearances: http://www.ctyme.com/mailman/listinfo/doctorow -- Digikam in repo is lagging, compiling is hard https://launchpad.net/bugs/72558 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
