Hi, thanks for your e-mail, GercoKees. I have ckit and elixir packaged in my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~eudoxos/+archive). For both of them, I used the version distributed from the oofem.org as upstream (since the real upstream is (1) not maintained since ages and (2) doesn't work with oofem). I used scons to build and install necessary files, you can see that in the source packages; the reason that I also had troubles with Makefiles and I am fluent with scons.
For oofem (and oofeg) itself, I installed it from sources on my computer, but I had to change a few things in configure.in to e able to pass /usr/local/ as prefix for ckit and elixir and sent the patch upstream; Bořek Patzák applied it to subversion and it will appear in the next release. He is about 1 minute walk from my office and cooperative in this sense. At that point, my packaging efforts stopped, since I didn't have neither time nor need for troubleshooting the compilation with all the optional dependencies (parmetis, petsc, various MPI variants). We should define clearly which of these optional features will be enabled, or if we will have multiple binary packages with different flavors (like vim-tiny, vim-gnome etc), one for plain oofem, one supporting MPI with shared memory, one for MPI on clusters (I am not sure whether those are mutually exclusive, for example). Do you have any clear proposition on that? I will subscribe to this bug so we can keep this discussion publicly here. Regards, Václav Šmilauer -- [needs-packaging] oofem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
