Hi, Personally i only use oofem and oofeg, without other optional features. I do not know a lot about the other options but i think most users only use those two. I think the testing tool also should be included (with all the example files as well)
I do not have a proposition on whether or not we should include all of the optional features by default. I am afraid the parralel version excludes the normal version so i think it is easier to have different binarys for different flavoures.... Maybe we can have oofem-iml, oofem-dss, poofem-parmetis (parallel oofem with parmetis) binarys? Greetz, Gerco-Kees -- [needs-packaging] oofem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
