On 12/04/2008 06:58 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:01:59PM -0000, Pander wrote:
>> License is multiple times in the .js source code, see
>>
>> ~/.mozilla/firefox/qh2aiwql.default/extensions/[EMAIL PROTECTED] grep -riI
>> mit *|grep -i license
>> chrome/content/shared/passwordmeter.js:License: MIT License (see below)
>> chrome/content/shared/passwordmeter.js:Modified: 20060620 - added MIT License
>> chrome/content/foxmarks-utils.js: License:
>> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
>> chrome/content/foxmarks-utils.js: * Released under the MIT license
>
> Folks should really put a license file in the .xpi ... otherwise we
> need to review each individual file and if there is any that doesnt
> have an explicit license hint, its not sure.
>
> We probably can remove preference .js files and install.rdf as well as
> chrome.manifest from the list of files that require an explicit
> copyright, but most authors forget license headers in .xul/xml files.
>
>
> - Alexander
>
When i spoke to author about this he stated that it is now nonfree and
when i dug harder into him for the license he stated all about the
copyright so i email him back stating i needed license not copyriguht
and never heard back from him.
--
Sincerely Yours,
John Vivirito
https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246
"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
-- Metallica from UnforgivenIII
--
[needs-packaging] Foxmarks (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158835
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
