On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:21:35AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote: > On 12/04/2008 06:59 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:55:37PM -0000, John Vivirito wrote: > >> On 11/12/2008 07:37 AM, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote: > >>> Prefixing the name of the binary package (if that's what you have > >>> done, I haven't checked - ignore this if the binary isn't called like > >>> that) with "firefox-" seems wrong to me, as the extensions can also be > >>> used with abrowser/IceWeasel and, in many cases, with other browsers > >>> (eg, SeaMonkey). > >>> > >>> > >> name of package is linkwidgets and it should work with all browsers it > >> supports iceweasel even sice we dont support iceweasel. > >> > > > > yes, linkwidgets is the right name. > > > > - Alexander > > > This is finished waiting for a push to archives in Jaunty. >
Yeah. I didnt add sessions this time during UDS so we can make more like a coding and work sprint out of this event. i hope sponsoring extensions will be in line with that ;). - Alexander -- [needs-packaging] firefox-linkwidgets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
