On 12/14/2008 12:18 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:34:47AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
>> On 12/08/2008 02:50 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>> we should rather rename them upstream. I never understood why folks add
>>> a prefix even though most work on multiple mozilla xul applications
>>> anyway.
>>>
>> That would just make that much more work since we have already packaged
>> them. changing depends it more work than its worth since we have most if
>> not all packaged (either in archives or ready or being worked on. If one
>> of them are not any of the above 1 or 2 we can package. I dont like the
>> idea of fixing each package since we have them.
>>
>
>
> You are right. Just would like to recall that in case we dont have it
> packaged we should try to convince upstream (as in debian) to drop
> this stupid name prefix. If that doesnt work out: maintain on our own
> and remove the iceweasel stuff.
>
> - Alexander
>
Since Ubuntu packages more extensions that Debian does why not merge the
other way like we do with sunbird/lightning, once we have it updated in
BZR we can push to Debian. That gets rid of naming issues.
Ours are also updated more often.
--
Sincerely Yours,
John Vivirito
https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246
"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
-- Metallica from Unforgiven III
--
[Jaunty] Please remove all iceweasel packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306229
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
