>Firstly, I don't see a difference in the XB-Npp-MimeType lines >that show up in the diff, am I missing something, or is it just whitespace?
There was a trailing space, I have removed it. >Also, Fabien's patch to handle chdir errors appears to leak file descriptors, I don't think it does but I could of course be wrong. The code in cpproc.c near the patch looks like this: ... close_all_fds(local_fds, pipe_count * 2); chdir(wd); ... from what I understand the line right before chdir(wd) closes the open file descriptors but maybe I am missing something? I will submittodebian when it is accepted. I have a question I have had a hard time finding an answer to: When should one choose among: iceape-dev, seamonkey-dev, libxul-dev, xulrunner-1.9-dev ? I have asked a few times on irc but never received a response. It seams that the iceape-dev comments suggest using seamonkey-dev instead, seamonkey-dev suggest using libxul-dev instead and I read something from debian that said not to use libxul-dev but to prefer xulrunner-dev. That message is here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/05/msg00009.html -- Please merge classpath 2:0.97.2-1.1 (universe) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309549 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
