Public bug reported:

Acording to the information that Intel provides on their website about
the intel D945GCLF2 with atom 330, it should have a  Intel® 945GC
Express Chipset, and it uses for video the Intel® Graphics Media
Accelerator 950, so i dont which driver ubuntu uses for this device,
because there no grapical user interface to point the vga driver, KDE4.2
only handles screen resolution, no chaning of drivers for vga.

http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/motherboards/D945gclf2/D945gclf2-overview.htm

But when i look into hardware plasmoid i see this:


CPU:    Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz
GPU:    Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
Audio:  HDA Intel (ALC662 Analog)
Audio:  HDA Intel (ALC662 Digital)
Audio:  HDA Intel ()
Netwerk:        Loopback device Interface
Netwerk:        Bridge Interface
Netwerk:        Networking Interface

So it seems that Ubuntu sees it as a different device? or am i wrong
here? I just hope the performance overall of intel gma would improve,
because it seems xorg has serieus performance issius with intel gma''s.

This is the result i get when running glxgears

wes...@dexter:~$ glxgears
102 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.380 FPS
138 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.444 FPS
140 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.939 FPS
146 frames in 5.0 seconds = 28.985 FPS
154 frames in 5.0 seconds = 30.782 FPS
43 frames in 5.1 seconds =  8.406 FPS
34 frames in 5.0 seconds =  6.782 FPS
35 frames in 5.1 seconds =  6.921 FPS
33 frames in 5.0 seconds =  6.545 FPS
35 frames in 5.1 seconds =  6.834 FPS
35 frames in 5.1 seconds =  6.874 FPS
34 frames in 5.0 seconds =  6.743 FPS
77 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15.251 FPS
138 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.570 FPS
87 frames in 5.1 seconds = 17.033 FPS
47 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.387 FPS
XIO:  fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0"
      after 7977 requests (7766 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
wes...@dexter:~$


I have enabled kwin desktop effects, and seems overall okay, but i believe that 
the performance could be better, i think i just dont ask much, but there is 
probably a serieus bug, and i ask you please go investigate this, there are 
more bugs like this on, and none is important enough acording to ubuntu to be 
fixed as fast as possible, i know that 9.04 is unstable but thats just why we 
should get things have stable in less then 4 month, he intel issues is already 
there since 8.10, it was reported about slow performance on gma 965, it seems 
this is on more gma''s from intel and could be a bug in xorg itself.

** Affects: ubuntu
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: 950 gma intel

** Summary changed:

- Does Ubuntu select the right drivers?
+ [Kubuntu 9.04 Alpha 2] Does Ubuntu select the right drivers?

** Tags added: 950 gma intel

** Description changed:

  Acording to the information that Intel provides on their website about
  the intel D945GCLF2 with atom 330, it should have a  Intel® 945GC
  Express Chipset, and it uses for video the Intel® Graphics Media
  Accelerator 950, so i dont which driver ubuntu uses for this device,
  because there no grapical user interface to point the vga driver, KDE4.2
  only handles screen resolution, no chaning of drivers for vga.
+ 
+ 
http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/motherboards/D945gclf2/D945gclf2-overview.htm
  
  But when i look into hardware plasmoid i see this:
  
  
  CPU:  Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz
  GPU:  Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
  Audio:        HDA Intel (ALC662 Analog)
  Audio:        HDA Intel (ALC662 Digital)
  Audio:        HDA Intel ()
  Netwerk:      Loopback device Interface
  Netwerk:      Bridge Interface
  Netwerk:      Networking Interface
  
  So it seems that Ubuntu sees it as a different device? or am i wrong
  here? I just hope the performance overall of intel gma would improve,
  because it seems xorg has serieus performance issius with intel gma''s.
  
  This is the result i get when running glxgears
  
  wes...@dexter:~$ glxgears
  102 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.380 FPS
  138 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.444 FPS
  140 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.939 FPS
  146 frames in 5.0 seconds = 28.985 FPS
  154 frames in 5.0 seconds = 30.782 FPS
  43 frames in 5.1 seconds =  8.406 FPS
  34 frames in 5.0 seconds =  6.782 FPS
  35 frames in 5.1 seconds =  6.921 FPS
  33 frames in 5.0 seconds =  6.545 FPS
  35 frames in 5.1 seconds =  6.834 FPS
  35 frames in 5.1 seconds =  6.874 FPS
  34 frames in 5.0 seconds =  6.743 FPS
  77 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15.251 FPS
  138 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.570 FPS
  87 frames in 5.1 seconds = 17.033 FPS
  47 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.387 FPS
  XIO:  fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0"
        after 7977 requests (7766 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
  wes...@dexter:~$
  
  
  I have enabled kwin desktop effects, and seems overall okay, but i believe 
that the performance could be better, i think i just dont ask much, but there 
is probably a serieus bug, and i ask you please go investigate this, there are 
more bugs like this on, and none is important enough acording to ubuntu to be 
fixed as fast as possible, i know that 9.04 is unstable but thats just why we 
should get things have stable in less then 4 month, he intel issues is already 
there since 8.10, it was reported about slow performance on gma 965, it seems 
this is on more gma''s from intel and could be a bug in xorg itself.

-- 
[Kubuntu 9.04 Alpha 2] Does Ubuntu select the right drivers?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314914
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to