> I wanted to develop a new report type for gnotime, but I am unable to find any
> information about how to do it - beyond the sample reports shipped with
> gnotime,
> and the "primer", which basically just provides a few more examples.
By "primer", do you mean /usr/share/gnotime/ghtml/C/gtt.scm ?
It is not up to gnotime to document Scheme, it is not a language created
for gnotime, it is a scripting language in it's own right - see all the
emacs type stuff.
Gnotime is far from orphaned, there have been lots of uploads since
2005:
* [2008-12-18] gnotime 2.3.0-4 MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
* [2008-11-29] Accepted 2.3.0-4 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2008-05-13] gnotime 2.3.0-3 MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
* [2008-03-19] Accepted 2.3.0-3 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2008-02-27] Accepted 2.3.0-2 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2008-02-16] Accepted 2.3.0-1 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2007-12-06] Accepted 2.2.3-2 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2007-09-25] Accepted 2.2.3-1 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2007-08-21] gnotime 2.2.2-11 MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
* [2007-08-07] Accepted 2.2.2-11 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2007-02-10] gnotime 2.2.2-10 MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
* [2007-01-29] Accepted 2.2.2-10 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2006-12-27] Accepted 2.2.2-9 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2006-12-19] Accepted 2.2.2-8 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2006-08-10] gnotime 2.2.2-7 MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
* [2006-07-29] Accepted 2.2.2-7 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2006-04-14] gnotime 2.2.2-6 MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
* [2006-03-29] Accepted 2.2.2-6 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2006-03-07] gnotime 2.2.2-5 MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
* [2006-02-24] Accepted 2.2.2-5 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2006-02-24] Accepted 2.2.2-4 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2005-12-14] gnotime 2.2.2-3 MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
* [2005-12-01] Accepted 2.2.2-3 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2005-11-28] Accepted 2.2.2-2 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2005-11-03] Accepted 2.2.2-1 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2005-09-25] Accepted 2.2.1+20050917-1 in experimental (low) (Goedson
Teixeira Paixao)
* [2005-08-22] Accepted 2.2.1-18 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2005-08-17] Accepted 2.2.1-17 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2005-04-29] Accepted 2.2.1-16 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
* [2005-04-04] Accepted 2.2.1-15 in unstable (low) (Goedson Teixeira Paixao)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnotime.html
Can't be helped if some of those didn't make it into your flavour of
Ubuntu.
I don't like Scheme, I don't use it but this bug is invalid. Gnotime
includes clear guidance that the reports need some scheme programming
(see the Gnotime help pages for reports), the rest is up to you. Scheme
is big enough to have plenty of examples and documentation, there is no
need for Gnotime to duplicate it.
--
Please document gnotime's report language
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130815
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
