On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 22:50 +0000, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > thank you for your work there, some comments: > - the tarball have a COPYING, is that you who changed to COPYING.LGPL2 and > COPYING.LGPL3? the sources states either can be used and the upstream COPYING > is a LGPL one so what the COPYING says should be enough there Current SVN, on which the original packaging is based, has COPYING.LGPL2 and COPYING.LGPL3.
> - the debian copyright doesn't needs to list that autotools are under GPL I've already fixed this (it's just not in my PPA yet), and corrected the fact that upstream is LGPL2.1 | LGPL3 rather than LGPL2+. > not sure that the library split is required, is anything else going to > use this one? the packaging changes Jelmer did are mostly incorrect > though, running autotools at build time is not something desktop > packages are doing so the rules change and the extra build-depends are > not required, the version coded in the install files also means it'll > not build using the new evolution-data-server which will be uploaded to > jaunty I had to patch configure.in to get it to build with the current version of evolution (which works fine with evolution-mapi) and to get it to build, because it requires a define for GNU_SOURCE (although that could be somewhere else as well). When should I be regenerating configure in this case if not at build-time ? Cheers, Jelmer -- Jelmer Vernooij <[email protected]> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/ Jabber: [email protected] -- [needs-packaging] evolution-mapi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
