That spec seems to be missing the point entirely.  The issue isn't just
that it's CLI vs. GUI.  It's that the CLI thing itself requires the user
to try out about a thousand different ways to connect and provides no
useful feedback (of any kind!) when it fails.  Any sane user would
rather have a CLI system that works and does the Right Thing (whatever
that right thing may be) over a GUI system that is confusing,
frustrating and poorly-documented.

In short, the issue isn't the UI, it's the functionality proper.
Pppoeconf doesn't work, out of the box, for any system I've ever used it
on.  I'm sure it works for some people somewhere, and I'm sure that if
you're really tenacious you can make it work on any system anywhere, but
when <b>MICROSOFT</b> can make something complex work simply and quickly
out of the box, not to mention every router box in the world, and Linux
can't?  It's time to make Linux catch up with what the rest of the world
has been able to do for years.

Linksys, incidentally, has a lot of GPLed code for their router and DSL
boxes.  Linksys routers, by coincidence, are easy to connect up to DSL
setups.  Perhaps a quick peek at <a
href="ftp://ftp.linksys.com/opensourcecode";>ftp://ftp.linksys.com/opensourcecode</a>
could make this happen quickly?

-- 
DSL configuration is suboptimal.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/52167

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to