I'm sorry but as someone who spends quite a lot of time working with
less experienced users, alarm bells start ringing as soon as the idea of
"auto-opening" windows are mentioned. New/none technically oriented
users to Ubuntu and Windows alike will not be terribly comfortable with
the window list anyway (as simple as it seems to anyone who has grown up
with computers) and thus are unlikely to check it regularly enough to
notice the sudden appearance of a new window and to presume that they
will find it in the midst of other activities depends on them switching
applications fluently rather than mainly using the web browser (or
whatever) and then shutting down with ether of Ubuntu's excellent
methods (menu on press of the hardware button or on panel) without
closing every window individually. Add to this virtual desktops (which
currently are only really accessible to power users, although Micro's
excellent tooltip patches which have been rejected completely had the
potential to change this) and some users may need to switch desktop to
find it. You need to consider that users do not treat windows as a
"queue" which they logically work through but rather as a "jumble" of
separate entities which overlap, stuff occasionally needs to be
transfered in between and which often get in each others way - using new
windows as a way to ask a question (do you want to update your system?)
is just ugly and neither user friendly or elegant. Whilst this behaviour
is used for Apple update manager, it is one of the things Ubuntu users
vividly remember as reasons why the windows desktop is so annoying.

Many aspects of the new notifications system are great (I love it with
pidgin libnotify although this needs to be installed by default to get
most of the benefit (even power users are lazy - they don't want to
install an obscure package to befit from such a key feature and normal
users will never find it)) but the lack of controls on notifications
leaves a huge void as to how can applications catch users attention
without driving them up the wall. The existing solution for update
notifications was little better - I know many a user who never bother to
look at the notification and update! Update notifications should be
delivered at a standard time and in a standard place - on login seems
like a good option although users should be consulted (this does raise
issues e.g. are you going to be telling users to restart just after they
have booted al a Windows) and if they are on startup they should lock
and even cover the screen (whilst gnome etc loads in the background) to
ensure that they are responded to and then continue in either a window
or a persistent notification showing a progress bar (the same would be
amazing if implemented for downloads, as although running downloads
completely in the background would make sense if users were less
impatient, having a non intrusive progress bar is the only way to make
it possible for users to work on something else without them constantly
checking on it, or worse loosing five minutes staring at the download
manager (in my experience at least)).

Sorry for the long post and good luck in getting everything working in
the best possible way for all users :-)

-- 
Do not launch in background
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331054
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to