I have no idea, I thought of supporting to revert the status of how it used to be. Perhaps James or Martin Pitt (uploader of that change) can give a better explanation. Or we should file this to the Debian maintainer upstream?
This is the changelog note from 5.2-2ubuntu2: * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes: - libbcel-java-doc: Add alternative dependency on libgcj-doc. - debian/control: Drop libbcel-java-doc's dependency to libxerces2-java-doc to a suggestion, since that is in multiverse. This is how it was before (5.2-2ubuntu1) in Ubuntu debian/control: Package: libbcel-java-doc Architecture: all Section: doc Depends: libgcj-doc | classpath-doc, libxerces2-java-doc Suggests: libbcel-java Description: Documentation for Byte Code Engineering Library (BCEL) Documentation for the BCEL Java library which is used to manipulate Java bytecode. . Homepage: http://jakarta.apache.org/bcel/ This is the Debian debian/control (5.2-3): Package: libbcel-java-doc Architecture: all Section: doc Depends: classpath-doc, libxerces2-java-doc Suggests: libbcel-java Description: Documentation for Byte Code Engineering Library (BCEL) Documentation for the BCEL Java library which is used to manipulate Java bytecode. . Homepage: http://jakarta.apache.org/bcel/ I've added a new patch to set as Depends only "libxerces2-java-doc". ** Attachment added: "bcel_5.2-3ubuntu3.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23024342/bcel_5.2-3ubuntu3.debdiff -- Can do more than suggest libxerces2-java-doc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190247 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs