Then would "Target to release" be appropriate?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status
<quote>
Fix Released:
* For a bug task about upstream projects: a release tarball was announced
and is publicly available
* For package maintainers, a fix was uploaded to an official Ubuntu
repository
o This does not include -proposed i.e. hardy-proposed
o Please don't hesitate to add a changelog as a comment, so people
know what to look out for
* If a bug is fixed in the current development branch, that is good enough
for Fix Released. If the bug also needs to be fixed in a stable release, use
the "Target to release" link to nominate it for that release.
</quote>
I am unfamiliar with how to do that, or even if it is appropriate.
However this issue/bug still remains unfixed in _current released
versions of Ubuntu_, so I am confused as to how/why it should be
backported rather than fixed. Aren't backports typically new features
rather than fixes to existing packages?
--
Evolution shows no alarm / notification for birthdays in local contacts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
