On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 18:11 +0000, Akkana Peck wrote:
> Something that wasn't entirely clear to me before, but maybe should have
> been: the problem may just be in the syntax of the rule that's generated
> during the upgrade. (I used do-release-upgrade to go from intrepid to
> jaunty.)
>
> Before the boot, here's the rule that's in 70-persistent-net.rules:
>
> # Converted from /etc/iftab on upgrade
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:50:8d:c0:b9:30",
> ATTRS{type}=="1", NAME="eth0"
>
> After boot, that rule is still there but this one has been added:
>
> # PCI device 0x1106:0x3065 (via-rhine)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> ATTR{address}=="00:50:8d:c0:b9:30", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*",
> NAME="eth1"
>
The two rules should both match the same device, the new rule is just
more specific.
I need to know why the old rule is not matching, which is why I need you
to run "udevadm test" while the old rule (but not the new rule) is in
place.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
[email protected]
--
upgrading to Jaunty renamed eth0 to eth1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
