On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:12 +0000, James Westby wrote: > If you use plain "bzr revert" without the "." this won't happen.
Wow, thanks for the tip! I think that first there shouldn't be a stack trace, that's always bad usability. But two "revert ." should give a message about keeping the merge record. I didn't realize that there was a difference between the two types of merge, but now that I know it's a useful distinction. There should be a way to discover it. -- Reverting the tree after a merge and remerging causes a backtrace https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
