Nice work, Andrew. Here are some suggestions (see debdiff): * Switch to debhelper 7 (compat, rules, control). * debian/rules: - I have tuned get-orig-source (saver than the previous, you have to recreate your source tarball) - Removed all unneeded quotation marks - Removed unneeded configure target - Empty build target and removed unneeded build-stamp target * debian/contol: - http://code.google.com/p/gnome-colors/ looks like the upstream homepage - Split depends line - changed short description (not optimal, but better)
I have two questions: 1. Should we rename the binary package names and putting something like icon and theme in the name? 2. How do we implement the bugfix described in the README file: Due to a bug in Nautilus, you may have to run the following commands for drag n' drop/visiting-folders to look correctly (replace sudo for its equivalent in other linux distros): sudo rm -f /usr/share/icons/gnome*/*/places/inode-directory.*g sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome/ sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-brave/ sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-human/ sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-noble/ sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-wine/ sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -qf /usr/share/icons/gnome-wise/ ** Attachment added: "gnome-colors_3.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24455500/gnome-colors_3.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff ** Attachment removed: "gnome-colors_3.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24455500/gnome- colors_3.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff -- [needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
