Mark said:

>> We all are complaining because we feel that pop-under or whaterer are
>> just wrong, and we want ubuntu to be perfect :)
>
>And I see your point! We've been focused on the idea that the action
>itself should be immediately accessible to the user (rather than a
>notification followed by a clickable panel icon followed by the action
>:-)). But the windows itself could be minimised. Let's explore that. I
>think it may be too late for Jaunty but I'll see what we can do

Please take this as constructive criticism, as it's meant that way.

My wife and I have windows on our laptop, but we rarely boot into it
since we run Ubuntu all the time.  It's the windows that came with pre-
installed on each machine so it has a lot of crapware that came from the
manufacturer.  When we do boot into it, not only do we have a bloated
notification area, but we also have to click through several pop-up and
pop-under windows (both!) that these applications bombard us with asking
us to upgrade our virus definitions, our java version, or whatever.  And
because they're all loading more DLL's to show a full GUI instead of a
notification, they slow the machine down.  Often we start doing the
thing we need to get done, and get interrupted by another one.  If they
just blinked away in the notification area, they'd be a lot less
annoying.

Plus, we're often puzzled to close an app in the foreground and find an
update window sitting behind it.. we'll stare at it and go "wait, I
didn't launch that update app, what's going on?".  This type of
behaviour makes the user feel they're not in control of their own
computer.  Running interactive programs that the user didn't ask us to
run is a confusing and bad paradigm, whether the window starts minimized
or not.  We often joke about how glad we are Ubuntu doesn't do that.

You know what else is annoying? the annoying windows popup 'reboot now
or remind me in 15 minutes" after you install updates.  Much more
intrusive then the Intrepid reboot notification.  Is that the type of
thing we're moving to for the reboot notification as well?

I understand that Mark is making a usability argument that he wants the
action to be available immediately.  But I don't understand what's so
wrong with the 'Hey, I see I've got updates, I should click on the icon
and install the updates'.  How is that different then the normal 'Hey, I
need to write an email, I'll click on the email icon to write my email'?
I don't see a difference.  Yes, we all agree the notification area was
abused, but it was designed for just this case.

Actually, take the email analogy further: Imagine if a mail notification
applet checked for new mail, didn't actually tell you when you had new
email, and then launched your heavyweight email app every 5 hours
regardless of what you're doing (unless you got a 'high priority mail',
then it would launch immediately).

It also appears that this bug report has lost the fact that now there is NO 
notification that there are (non-critical) updates, allowing the user to decide 
when to install them.  Instead, Ubuntu has (arbitrarily, though I assume user 
configurable in the future) when it will run the update manager and force the 
issue the issue on an unsuspecting user.  
If they decide to not do the updates at that time (after closing this random 
window that appeared on their desktop they didn't ask for), then there's no 
persistent notification that there are pending updates.  I guess not until the 
next interval.  I've been waiting for updates since I upgraded to jaunty, and 
now I know why I wasn't seeing them.  Some people are interested in 
non-critical updates too.  

By focusing solely on the 'I want the user's action to be available
immediately when the event happens' perceived problem, we've completely
removed the persistent reminder.  You've essentially dictated
temporarily when you want updates installed, regardless of whether user
wants to (or can, think modem users who actually -can't- update from a
network at certain times).  Without a persistent notification mechanism,
they're likely to forget to update the next time they are on a network.

(one thing my wife just pointed out, if you close the update window
because you're not ready to install updates at that time, then now
you've got to go digging through a menu to launch it again, instead of
having an icon readily available on your desktop).

Bottom line is, the goal of improving the use of the notification area
is a noble one, but you've taken away the proper uses of the area and
created a major usability regression.  Running visible programs the user
didn't ask for leads the user confusion and frustration, and the feeling
like we're, frankly, back at Bug #1.

-- 
[Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to