** Description changed:

  A few references to start off with:
  
  http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=283881
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/partman-md/+bug/22301
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+bug/58892
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+bug/58893
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+bug/58894
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/33649
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/partman-md/+bug/16790
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/22673
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/preseed/+bug/31435
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/45523
  https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/partman-md/+bug/63235
  
  This is just a smattering of the RAID-related problems with Ubuntu.
  
  Linux software RAID has long been touted as being top-quality, nearly
  comparable to hardware RAID in performance, and, in many ways, superior
  to some hardware RAID in reliability.  Additionally, Ubuntu's partman
  makes it relatively easy to set up software RAID in a menu-driven
  interface.  There is, therefore, no reason why software RAID should take
  a back seat to other issues, when it directly relates to fundamental
  system robustness and reliability.  We should want people to use Ubuntu
  Linux for RAID setups, because we want people who need RAID to want to
  use Ubuntu.
  
  When I first switched to Ubuntu, I tried to install Edgy.
  Unfortunately, that didn't go well.  The installer kept hanging up, and
  I was never able to proceed.  Then I tried Dapper.  That seemed to go
  very well, until I did some very basic tests and investigation, and
  found that while I did indeed have software RAID1 working, the installer
  had set up the system so that the loss of the primary disk would mean
  effective total data loss for both disks.  I had to manually reconfigure
  menu.lst and install GRUB properly to get my system set up right.
  
  This incomplete attention to software RAID inherent in Ubuntu has me
  worried.  I would like to be able to upgrade to Edgy when it comes out,
  but I am concerned that it'll leave my system in an unusable state.  So
  I asked in the forums, and I got a response from one poor unfortunate
  person who did indeed try to upgrade to Edgy on a RAID setup.  I quote
- from "eric.ws.anderson":
+ from "ews":
  
  > Edgy broke my RAID0 config (which wasn't quick to setup). 
  > It has left me without X, without the interweb, and without a kernel that 
loads.
  >
- > Before taking the plunge, I seeked advice from those on irc.freenode.net 
+ > Before taking the plunge, I sought advice from those on irc.freenode.net 
  > #ubuntu+1 and #xubuntu I was assured that the RAID would not be affected 
  > and the entire dist-upgrade would be smooth and painless. Baloney.
  > 
  > Funny how everyone was so keen to push Edgy and make the claim that 
  > RAID is untouched. I even pasted the link to the original how-to I followed 
  > to set up the fakeraid. But after going back to the channels for help with
  > a broken install, the general consensus is that "oh, can't help you, never 
  > used RAID before".
  > 
  > Frustrating to say the least. Think twice, RAID users, think twice.
  
  I would like to plead with Ubuntu developers to PLEASE address these
  issues.

-- 
Meta-bug:  Ubuntu needs major software RAID overhaul
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68308
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to