Nope, no irony. Ubuntu rules. You guys too! On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Alexander Sack <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Jesus! You actually respond to the bugs? How efficient! > > is that irony? otherwise, happy that it worked for you now. you are > welcome! ;) > > ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) > Status: Incomplete => Invalid > > -- > package flashplugin-installer 10.0.22.87ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: > takes too long > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359116 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree > > I waited 15 minutes and the install of this package just hanged on about > 60%. > > ProblemType: Package > Architecture: i386 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 > ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script killed by signal > (Interrupt) > Package: flashplugin-installer 10.0.22.87ubuntu2 > SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree > Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.0.22.87ubuntu2 failed to > install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script killed by signal > (Interrupt) > Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 > -- package flashplugin-installer 10.0.22.87ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: takes too long https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359116 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
