What do you mean by 'hard links are correctly reported'? In my case, files with more than one hard link are not used in the ring chart and in the overview of sizes (which is not correct).
So, Baobab gets the (correct) information about the file sizes. However, if a file has more than one hard link, Baobab does not count the size of a file. It states only that there are hard links (with correct size), but discards the file in the total calculation. In my opinion, all files have hard links (most files have one hard link) and should just be counted. Furthermore I have 15 kb of hard links in my /usr/bin. As they are only 15 kb, I cannot see if they are actually counted. I think the bug is inside Baobab: The way (more than one) hard link(s) is/are processed. Thanks for the time you take to help with this bug :-). Hopefully, my post is helping to solve the solution. Please tell me if I talk nonsense ;-). -- Baobab reports incorrect sizes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
