On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:27:36PM -0000, Michael Terry wrote: > I thought, "Don't we have HAL for this, with its own, larger set of > quirks?". And indeed, replacing sleep.sh's logic with a dbus call to > HAL fixed the bug for me.
Yes, and as a matter of fact, the existing quirks in acpi-support were dropped in the jaunty cycle, thinking that we were done with using acpi-support for suspend by default - the case of suspending from the gdm screen was overlooked. I think it would be fine to have acpi-support call pm-suspend or pm-hibernate directly in these cases. Though this may need revision again over the course of the karmic release cycle, since the new gdm, if it lands, is supposed to me much more "desktop-y", and may handle such events directly. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- Prefer HAL when suspending/hibernating ourselves https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
