*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 298706 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298706
Your package is split in a binary and a data file. It also contains a patch I
haven't implemented.
I'm not a Motu myself, I only contribute new packages or patches for review at
time or develop some aditional helper applications for Ubuntu, so I'm not able
to maintain the package. (I'll try to become a Motu if I have more experience
in creating Debian packages)
Your package is more professional, but my is more recent. You have created a
smile and a smile-data package, but I think the -data package is not needed
because the data (images etc.) is linked to the Smile binary by default.
What is the reason for the source-code patch you apply? My package is available
at GetDeb at time, and until now no user has found a bug (maybe this is fixed
in the newer Smile version?)
Having two packages which to exactly the same is really no way to solve this.
Because you have more experience in creating high-quality Ubuntu/Debian
packages (as I see on your Wiki-page), I think you should decide how to
proceed. If I can do somethink to get this package(s) into the repos, please
let me know! (maybe per Mail to keep this bug-comment lines clean)
Regards
Matthias Klumpp
--
[needs-packaging] S.M.I.L.E
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340606
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
