I got a taste of ZFS with Solaris and PC-BSD, and I must say, I can't
get that taste out of my mouth!

While I found PC-BSD, as a whole, to be relatively immature as a usable
desktop OS (a great effort, though, not quite there yet), and
OpenSolaris to be the same, only with surprising less ZFS capability
using the native installer, the BEST thing about using both of these
OSes was getting to try out ZFS. It is AWESOME! But, I guess htat's why
this bug exists.

So, I guess there are a few options, all of which will take a lot of
time and effort.

1. Somehow make GPL and CDDL work together (not likely).

2. Create your own implementation of ZFS written under the GPLvX...This
may have legal ramifications of its own, since maybe this would violate
patents in the ZFS specification?

3. Create a similar, competing FS that can do all, most, or more of the
COOL things ZFS can, but designed and created under a GPL friendly
license.

>From what I remember, there are some file systems currently in
development or some level of release that have goals similar to ZFS, but
without corporate support (like Sun backing ZFS). I doubt they will ever
be ready before something better exists (maybe options 1 or 2). I could
be wrong, though.

So, it looks like a pretty "not so good" for this happening, but I
support this "bug"(/feature) request, and I admire its similarity to bug
#1 (If you don't know what that is, please look it up!)

Also, what about the license compatibility of having NTFS drivers
running on the linux kernel? Surely, if that can be accomplished, they
can make a driver fore ZFS. And the point about NVidia drivers, surely
their license is more restrictive than the CDDL.

Just my thoughts in support of solving this bug ;-)

Cheers,

--mobrien118

-- 
Add native ZFS to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202952
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to