Wow. OK... I was merely addressing this comment:
"I argue that the new default value for the compression option is *not* a good balance between speed and quality. For me, the new default behavior is a clear *regression* compared to the previous versions." made by Andrey earlier in this thread. This is not a regression, since nothing has changed. On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Bruce Cowan <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm unsubscribing from all my bug reports here once I receive any > bugmail, but I'd like to point out that the last comment was rather > rude. > > -- > Scanner output always JPEG compressed > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192176 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Scanner output always JPEG compressed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192176 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
