Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ubuntu-restricted-extras

I suggest that for the upcoming Karmic release, we include p7zip-full in
the ubuntu-restricted-extras metapackage.

Justification:
1. The 7z format (an implementation of the LZMA algorithm) is one of the most 
efficient compression algorithms for end-users (in terms of the balance  
between efficiency and CPU/memory usage). It is already in our repository 
patent-unencumbered, and usually surpasses the efficiency of RAR (which is more 
efficient than bzip2 and gzip, but patent-encumbered).
2. Users who install "restricted" packages are more likely to exchange media 
with users from other operating systems. Since WinRAR is the most ubiquitous 
*third-party* archiver on Windows (that also supports the 7z format natively), 
we are improving the user experience by including the capability to exchange 
common archive formats.
3. Related to the previous point: the p7zip-full package (as opposed to the 
p7zip package) supports other formats such as RAR. Patent concerns are 
unnecessary (as this package is already included within our universe 
repository).
4. GNOME's official archive manager (file-roller) will automatically detect the 
presence of the command-line p7zip binaries when they are installed, and offer 
support to compress and decompress archives within its interface - no extra 
work is required for this integration.
5. By introducing the 7z format to a wider audience, perhaps this will 
accelerate efforts for Ubuntu to implement the dpkg-lzma blueprint (which would 
allow for the p7zip package to be included on the Live CD - though this is a 
subject for a different bug). See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/dpkg-lzma

For an ongoing discussion on the Ubuntu Forums, see this thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1165142

** Affects: ubuntu-restricted-extras (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: ubuntu-restricted-extras
  
  I suggest that for the upcoming Karmic release, we include p7zip-full in
  the ubuntu-restricted-extras metapackage.
  
  Justification:
  1. The 7z format (an implementation of the LZMA algorithm) is one of the most 
efficient compression algorithms for end-users (in terms of the balance  
between efficiency and CPU/memory usage). It is already in our repository 
patent-unencumbered, and usually surpasses the efficiency of RAR (which is more 
efficient than bzip2 and gzip, but patent-encumbered).
  2. Users who install "restricted" packages are more likely to exchange media 
with users from other operating systems. Since WinRAR is the most ubiquitous 
*third-party* archiver on Windows (that also supports the 7z format natively), 
we are improving the user experience by including the capability to exchange 
common archive formats.
  3. Related to the previous point: the p7zip-full package (as opposed to the 
p7zip package) supports other formats such as RAR. Patent concerns are 
unnecessary (as this package is already included within our universe 
repository).
  4. GNOME's official archive manager (file-roller) will automatically detect 
the presence of the command-line p7zip binaries when they are installed, and 
offer support to compress and decompress archives within its interface - no 
extra work is required for this integration.
  5. By introducing the 7z format to a wider audience, perhaps this will 
accelerate efforts for Ubuntu to implement the dpkg-lzma blueprint (which would 
allow for the p7zip package to be included on the Live CD - though this is a 
subject for a different bug). See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/dpkg-lzma
  
  For an ongoing discussion on the Ubuntu Forums, see this thread:
- http://ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=359
+ http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1165142

-- 
Proposal: include p7zip-full in ubuntu-restricted-extras metapackage
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379236
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to