Since this is a fork of the "lzma" package, and since xz-utils
provides/replaces the "lzma" binary package, I think it is only sensible
to choose between xz-utils and lzma. Currently building against stuff
from the "lzma" source package are:
Package: cacao-oj6
Package: eglibc
Package: gcc-4.2
Package: gcc-4.3
Package: gcc-4.4
Package: gcc-snapshot
Package: gcj-4.2
Package: gcj-4.3
Package: gcj-4.4
Package: gdc-4.2
Package: glibc
Package: gnat-4.2
Package: gnat-4.3
Package: gnat-4.4
Package: kdeutils
Package: openjdk-6
Package: squashfs
It looks like kdeutils already uses lzma-dev, so this just re-enforces
the point.
** Changed in: xz-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Main Inclusion Report for xz-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405623
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
